What it the Big Deal - a Buyer wants to Buy - a Seller Wants to Sell

Think about the Real Estate Buying process. Often times the Buyer has a property in mind when they first call the Realtor, but quite often they do NOT buy that home. Had the buyer called the Seller direct they may have liked the home. But the Realtor may have other motives or reasons for convincing you that another home is a better option.
r
Just Remember to have a plan, and know your own mind. Don't get caught up in Realtor Knows Best, they don't know what you think they know. And the Realtor should not be making your decisions for you. Most of the time you don't even know that the Realtor is pushing you toward a particular decision or property.
R
I suggest that you call the listing agent, go look at the property, if you like it decide on terms and what you want in the contract BEFORE you call the Realtor and go for it, best to have a real estate attorney - though don't trust they know all that can hurt you - they don't - you, the real estate consumer really do have to look out for yourself. r

If you can buy a FSBO then do that, but for now most properties are listed with a Realtor and will be until the Real Estate Consumer wakes up to what is really happening. And in this I feel the listing agent is best, NEVER tie down to a contractual agreement with a buyers agent. If you do you will have more stress, you will pay more and you have to pay the real estate buyers agent even if you buy a FSBO. It is not Fair. Though many believe having a Buyers Agent offers better protection, I believe that is a Flat Out Lie. Knowledge is Power and the Cold Hard facts are using a listing agent to represent you in a sale is way better on every level then using a buyers agent.

r

Real Estate Decisions - Who is Really Making Them ?

There are so many Real Estate Decisions to make throughout the real estate process that you, the real estate consumer, think that you are making but really the Realtor is making the decision.

Many will not believe this, and that is fine. And certainly Realtors will deny it, but it is VERY easy to distract and steer a Real Estate Buyer. The Realtor chooses how they show what properties. Such as taking you to high prices, bad looking properties first to make their listing (later that day) for the the price look like a much better deal.
r
Buyers think they choose the Title Company but they are steered or guilt tripped into the Title Company that the Realtor chooses, which is illegal but hey what the buyer don't know?
R
Realtor "have to" give you a choice of home inspectors or appraisers but "really" they steer you toward a particular one, you may not even know that they have steered you, but they have.
r
Who will clean your house, who will be the best company for dirt work or construction projects ? Who Will you call to house sit, take care of the lawn or for your real estate insurance? My guess is that the Realtor has an answer for every one of these questions and my guess is that you will go with the person or company your new friend, the Realtor suggests.

Just Make absolutely sure that what You Decide, the decision of and surrounding your real estate transaction, make sure that they really are your decision.

the CMA and Your Divorce

This is such an illusion. It would depend on which spouse called the Realtor first. And the question the Realtor would ask is are you trying to buy them out, then we can get comps to make it look worth less, if they are trying to buy you out we can find comps to make it worth more. Are you going to sell it now ?
r
Really, this does happen. You Can comp a property drastically higher or lower depending on the situation. And the Realtor will decided which party to the divorce will benefit them more, be it monetarily or who they like better.
r
I would alway get several comps or at least 2 appraisers. It is who you know and not Real, Actual Value that Factors into this illusion.
r
More on this Topic Later

more On Banks in Real Estate

Something that affects you but is decided by Realtors and you get no vote, no voice on, how could this possibly be good for you, the real estate consumer ? Banks have crooked dealing, obviously, we all know this can and does happen and we all see the banks in Economic Collapse. However, the Realtors are not innocent in getting the banks to where they are now. Pushing Bad loans takes involves Realtors, Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, Banks and More.

The lenders let this happen, they had obvious signs but the Realtors are who directly affect you. If a bank collapses, you are protected to a certain amount. If a Realtor fails to disclose, encourages you to trust them and buy at a bad time and you end up losing your assets from the direct result of a Realtors involvement then you have no protection at all.

Getting the Realtor out of the Real Estate Transaction is one step closer between you and your lender. Even if you do not need a lender you need real title protection and title companies are just not doing a very good job at protecting the consumer. Title Companies only insure a legal description and that is NOT good for the real estate consumer.

Banks use your money overnight to make investments, do currency trading and more and you get no say, this is nothing new. I do get that banks are not necessarily a good thing for consumers, however, the Realtor in the mix, backed by the NAR and having no accountability, is absolutely bad and affects your Real Life, meaning not the world or the economy as a whole but your household, your individual pocketbook, your assets, and your families real life day to day health and well being.

Most all of the Realtors, NAR’s reasons for keeping banks out of real estate are in case they…. And these reasons which are listed elsewhere in this site, these reasons the Realtors are doing to the Real Estate Consumer Right Now.

If the Realtors March and Stomp their feet in Washing DC and your not let in on what they want, odds are what they are trying to do benefit’s the Realtor and NOT the Real Estate Consumer.
Banks in Real Estate is not something that should be totally rejected, the Realtors don’t’ want it, but hey, we all have to play in the finance world somehow, that is just how our world works and turn on your TV, even when banks fail, they don’t fail. When Realtors Fail, you lose EVERYTHING.
r
The Realtors should not get to decide for the people. The people should get to decide for themselves.

Dual Agency Debates Continue ...

Eliminating Dual Agency is NOT the Answer.

Just don’t Use a Realtor, if you must use a Realtor then Dual Agency is a must for buyers and for sellers. The believe that having a Sellers agent and a Buyers Agent separate will somehow protect you more is a myth. This is simply NOT true. I want “REALTOR” out of the Real Estate Transaction, however, if you are going to use a Realtor and you are a Seller you want your Realtor to Go Find a BUYER and not and sit and wait for a buyers agent to do it for them or market only to other REALTORS.

Buyers want Dual Agency because they will get more and better attention. Buyers are treated better in dual agency with showings and more things told to them. And most often buyers get a better price in dual agency.

Yes it is a sticky wicket, but removing Dual Agency is not the answer, Removing “Realtor” NAR is, unless they do an intense amount of cleaning house. Because Realtor Ethics and Accountability is no where in Site at this time.
g

What are the Realtors saying about my Blogs and Websites - Paul Henderson Lacey Washington

Realtors think I a write this stuff because I suck at Real Estate, I mean in their minds what possibly could be the motive if not that I just can’t make it as a Realtor? Well folks, it is that I have a conscious, I have studied a whole lot of legal cases, seen Associations of Realtors stand for the Realtor over the consumer even in the face of, without a doubt proof. I have read real estate law books though Paul Henderson alludes to the fact that I “ain’t got no learnin”. I speak the truth from my experience as a Realtor, as a Real Estate Broker Owner. Not a Franchise puppet but an owner of my own company, believe me I know what I am talking about and if I don’t dress in a way you recogonize as truth then so be. Is 1 and 1 only equal to 2 if I dress in a suit or use “proper grammar”?

Paul Henderson slams the FSBO in this little ditty as well, lets take a closer look at Paul Henderson’s comments which this woman, as Paul Henderson -, Realtor calls me, this woman who ain’t got no learnin’ is going to immortalize on the internet and market better then Paul Henderson will market any of your real estate listings.

Paul Henderson’ slam is in Blue and My Comments are in Black. We shall soon move down the list to all Realtors who think they get what I am doing and have chimed in here with Paul Henderson . And I will Comment on what nice words they have to say about me in a later post.

Here is the Rant

And I'm the Slime Ball!
I was talking to a FSBO, (for sale by owner) (gee I think we know what a FSBO is but thanks for explaining to those of us who “ain’t got no learning.) who was wondering why Realtors were such Slime balls. It was nice that they dropped by my listing to ask. I asked why am I a slime ball, I had never even talked to this woman before. She said that her friend had showed her this YouTube video and then she had gone to this broker's website.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4BoLOiTZ_o

I told this woman that if she believed everything that appears on the internet, why is your house still for sale?

So he slammed the FSBO because their house is still on the market.

It's because Realtors are restricting the market and making their houses so much more appealing to the public (I call it advertising.)

Maybe the FSBO did not word it correctly or you with all your “learning” did not write the conversation correctly, SHE is absolutely right about Realtors restricting the market. Realtors are not needed but force themselves into the sale for a living. Keeping Banks out of Real Estate, such as the Topic of the Video, is one of those ways.

Slamming this FSBO woman is a sure sign of Paul Henderson’s character and a sign of how Paul Henderson of Lacey Washington would treat this woman if she did list with him.

And what Paul Henderson calls “advertising” is of no use to you. If Paul’s FSBO is reading this email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com and I will give you FREE marketing and marketing tips, you will be on top of the Super Paul Henderson’s Washington real estate market soon.

This woman claimed that Realtors had stolen all her for sale signs she had posted on the street corners directing people to her house. How did she know it was a Realtor that had stolen her signs?

Hey FSBO, I believe it, I have seen it happen, take a Video of the Realtor doing this, and email it to me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com , I guarantee your story immediate and strong internet presence for the name and the company that is doing this to you, prove it and I will Expose it.

She said because who else would do it? I pointed out, if her house was located within the city limits of certain towns that sign ordinances were in place and the public works department collected signs that were out of compliance.

This Does Happen, however there is a nicer way to talk to people Mr. Paul Henderson.

I don't want to drive more traffic to this woman on YouTube or her website but if you want to see some true propaganda look her up.


Yes “true propaganda” I am telling the truth, I charged this to keep Realtors out, I have since decided to go ahead and let the Realtors attack me, it happens with or without my real estate industry whistleblower blog so …

If you want to subscribe, for $75 per year, you can learn all sorts of information about our industry. I also included her blog, for all the dirt. (I've seen shorter infomercials!)

Again the Blog is Free, and So is Real Estate Marketing for the FSBO, You Do NOT need a Realtor, NAR member to sell your real estate. There is Not One Reason to use a Realtor to market your home. Selling without a Realtor has stronger marketing power online, less drama, less humiliaton, more protection and more money.

then Paul Henderson points the Realtors to my Sites for the Attack.

http://www.savvybroker.com/

Blog
http://www.realestateindustrywhistleblower.com/

I hated to break off this debate but I was waiting for my clients and really didn't want this person dragging my clients off with her tales of fantasy.

No, we can’t have you clients knowing the truth, that is bad for business.

I did ask her, if I brought her a qualified buyer, what she was offering in the way of commission. She replied "Screw You!"

This was bold and twisted of you, slam her (the FSBO) then want her to pay you to sell her real estate. Low Down, Disgraceful, UnEthical, and immorral at best.

I declined!

Is this a Sexual Connotation Paul Henderson ?. You Paul Henderson are Slime, as your FSBO attacker called you, putting sex into the mix at the end of this rant really wraps up what Paul Henderson is all about.

(I am not affiliated with the before mentioned websites or wish to be in anyway)

Well Paul Henderson now that you have Called Me Out, you are affiliated with me forever.

Authored by Paul S. Henderson, Realtor, RE/MAX Professionals, Lacey, WA.

Signed
This Woman…


Paul Henderson also says this about me “...Aint she got no learning. I believe she spoke of having only one week of education total, a kindergarten drop out…’

It takes one week to be a Real Estate Agent, at this point the Real Estate Consumer Believes that the Real Estate Agent knows more then they actually do. Real Estate School teaches us how to take the real estate test. Some Real Estate Agents take longer courses and some get those fancy titles such as GRI ( which is worthless.. More on that later).
r
But for the most part, one week of real estate school is all it takes. The educated public surely did not think that me saying “one week” of school meant kindergarten. I mean is Paul Henderson suggesting that we can count Grade School and High School as part of our Real Estate Education? I guess so, I mean you only have to be a High School Graduate or have taken your GED to qualify for that “one week” it takes to be a Real Estate Agent, Realtor.

So Paul Henderson has called me out in a battle of wits, though he is seemingly unarmed, and so we shall see what happens next…

I tell the truth, I know what I am talking about, I have seen it first hand, I can prove it and Paul Henderson, Realtor of the Lacey Washington Real Estate Market is flat out lying and throwing slanderous demeaning remarks my way to somehow defend how he treated a FSBO that was asking him questions. Paul Henderson is not an honorable man, and Paul Henderson has started a Cyber War with the Real Estate Industry Whistleblower.

Watch out for Paul Henderson, Washington Realtor. He talks this way to a FSBO, he is arrogant, he slams my education level, slams me and it sound like your only worth of tolerance if you list with him, otherwise he will talk down to you. If you list with him, it will most likely be behind your back instead.

Paul Henderson wants you to NOT Believe me because I have Grammar Errors and I don’t dress like I know what I am talking about.

This should be a major red flag to ALL real estate consumers, a Suit Does not mean your more knowledgable or can provide more protection to the real estate consumer.

Whether I dress formal or casual the message is the same. Examine all this folks, you can see here what Paul Henderson thinks of himself, his fancy suits and apparently feels he knows more then me and can therefore slam me with this disgraceful remark “Aint she got no learning.” This is a Realtor, this is who you are letting into your homes, if he will talk this way to me and to the FSBO in this Post then he will treat you this way, if not in front of you then behind your back.

Find Out the Truth For Yourself Folks
Knowledge is Power.

Headlines Keep Reading, Realtors Urge Congress....

This is so wrong. Do not doubt for one minute that Realtors definately had a role, a very big role in the current financial crisis. As an Ex-Realtor and Real Estate Industry Whistleblower - I do not believe that NAR, the National Association of Realtor or their now president Charles McMillan have ANY right to tell or urge congress to do anything
r
Realtors March and Stomp their feet in every corner of American and on up those Washington D.C. steps to push laws, changes and what is best for the Realtor. And most of the time, or shall I say all of the time, the Real Estate Consumer is not made to be part of the decision. Realtors Urge and Congress acts. I mean they are a Billion Dollar Company right, they should have more say over what is good for the Real Estate Consumer then the Real Estate Consumer Does, Right?
r
Realtors, NAR, Stay out of Washington D.C. Sit Down and Shut up and let the Consumers win for a change. Congress, I urge you to get Realtors OUT of the Real Estate Transaction.
r

Realtors Role in the Real Estate Recession

Do Realtors, NAR have any role in the Real Estate Recession ?
r
You Bet they Do. Realtors, NAR seems to be acting like it is everybody else's fault and hurry up and let the Mortgage purse strings go so we can get back at it. NAR is to blame in a Major way, Realtors are more a part of the financing then people admit.
r
Realtors also do not police MLS data and this data creates the market. Much more on this later, but for now, know this Realtor had a MAJOR role in the very fallen real estate market. And they can't wait for the mortgage money to flow freely so that they can do it again.
r

War on the Real Estate Consumer

A Relentless, Ever Pursuing war on the Real Estate Consumer. The Players are the Realtor and NAR as they constantly lobby in Washington D.C against the rights of the real estate consumer. Next the Appraisers who buckle at the lenders, mortgage broker and Realtors request of what it needs to come in at, the Big E an O insurance companies and with NAR pushing for mandatory E and O insurance state wide (while knowing full well that it is not the “intention” of E and O insurance to protect the Real Estate Consumer. )

There are large companies such as Realogy / Cartus / Apollo Management or whatever they go by today, they are too big for any consumer to win going up against them and they own C21, Coldwell Banker, ERA and Sotheby's.

And the real estate consumer is paying their bills and keeping them in the Big Money, with no accountability or protection in return for these so called services.

Ironically enough, when the Realtor becomes the Real Estate Consumer, it comes down to, Not Right or Wrong or Proven Fraud, but on which Realtor has the Biggest name or the biggest franchise behind them. And then the Realtor, the little guy or gal Realtor loses against the franchised Realtor and the Association chooses sides, even in the face of proven fraud.

The War against the Real Estate Consumer, has no foreseeable end in site. So protect yourself by knowing the truth about the Real Estate Industry in it’s entirety.
r

Buyer Bonuses in the News.. NAR at it again- Fraud - Deception - you Bet

Buyers Bonuses for Realtors are Bad for Real Estate Consumers.
These bonuses do not have to be disclosed in anyway.

The Realtor Get Paid enough already, and to give more incentive, this is VERY wrong. Where are the Real Estate Consumers Rights in all this? You have NONE. Below the REALTOR article on this Topic is in BLUE and my Rant on the nonsense and anti-consumer National Association of Realtor is in BLACK.


Bonus pay
Some home sellers sweetening the pay to buyer's agent -- is it worth it?

By Amy Hoak, MarketWatch

First of all Buyers agent commission is factor in to the SOLD data and helps to Create a False Market. Buyers Agent Bonuses SHOULD be Illegal. Buyers Agent do steer clients to properties that pay them the most. I don't care what NAR wants you to believe about the real estate consumer deciding for themselves, quite often the Real Estate Consumer does not even know that the Realtor is pulling the strings, but they are.

These days, a real-estate agent's paycheck doesn't necessarily stop at a cut of the commission.

These Day.. what is that suppose to mean, Buyers Agent bonuses have been around for a long time, they are not new, they are often times VERY large and on top of commissions and the are WRONG in every sense.

In markets with a glut of homes for sale -- and there are many of them -- sellers are in fierce competition, each hoping to lure buyers to their properties for a showing. Some of them are making appeals to the pocketbooks of agents working with the buyers. And the buyer might never know about that added bonus.

The Buyer is NEVER told about these Bonuses, and they should be, this kind of non-disclosure is deceitful and you, the Real Estate Conumer Pays. Direct "appeals" to the pockets of real estate agents will take precendent over what is best for the consumer most EVERY time.

"With the market shifting from a seller's market to much more of a buyer's market, those incentives are increasing," said Leslie Tyler, vice president of marketing for ZipRealty, a real-estate brokerage headquartered in Emeryville, Calif. "When you're selling a home, there's a number of different levers you can pull to move your house quicker. You can change the price, you can offer an incentive to an agent, you can paint the front door."

Realtor Incentives on top of outrageous commissions, not only affect the SOLD data and the market as a whole, but are unscrupulous attacks on the real estate consumer.

Mentions of cash bonuses, gift cards and other incentives are attached to some listings -- information that real-estate agents can see through professional listing services but that buyers don't have access to through printouts or Web sites. Builders are especially fond of offering extras, sometimes sending out emails to brokerages about them, said Noah Freedman, a principal with the brokerage firm Bond New York Real Estate.

One builder, for example, recently offered a $5,000 American Express gift card to agents in exchange for a buyer who signed a contract on a Long Island City, N.Y., condominium, Freedman said. During the last year, the agent who brought in a buyer for a penthouse in a financial district building in New York City was promised a fully paid lease on a BMW for a set period of time, he added.

Is this included in the SOLD data, is this disclosed to a buyer.. no way.

The main advantage of these incentives: They often catch the eyes of real-estate agents, attracting attention to one property in a sea of available homes, Freedman said.
Whether they have that much of an influence on the eventual sale, however, isn't as clear.
"At the end of the day, you can't make someone buy something because you're going to get an AmEx card," Freedman said.


YOU BET they influence a sale. Do not doubt that for one second. And yes, a Realtor can make someone buy. You would be shocked at the minipulating power of some Realtors. And with Extra incentive, those properties will definately move fast and first and this SHOULD be illegal and should be investigated by the Department of Justice.

Extra Ethics
Real-estate agents have a responsibility to show buyers the homes that best suit their needs, said Michael Thiel, associate counsel for the National Association of Realtors. And while the perks may be nice, "the obligation to the client is primary."


NAR members have a "responsiblity" what a joke, that's like a pinky swear in grade school. Realtors are self governed and Have No accountability. Realtors have to obey Ethics, Laws, and Standards of practice only in theory.. no one makes them. And there is NO real "obligation to the client" Michael Thiel is full of BULL on this one. Buyers are no shown, most of the time what is best for them, but instead what is best for the Realtor.

The incentive could be influential when two similar homes are available -- and one of them offers a little something extra, he said. In a case like that, an agent might show the property with the incentive first. But that could be where the advantage ends.

Wrong, the other one will not be in the running unless the buyer brings it in and then the Realtor will find a way to make the property without the bonus look bad or inferior somehow.

That's because there's also a financial incentive to finding the right fit for a home buyer, Thiel and others pointed out. If agents get greedy and only show homes that would give them a bigger payday, there's a chance that clients won't like any of them. The agent then risks losing the client altogether.

Not True, the real estate consumer are like sheeps to slaughter and they trust that the Realtor, of supposed Higher Standards will do right by them. Agents do not care about risking losing a client, many more will in place behind that one. And odds are the client won't even know what hit them.

In general, agents are not obliged to disclose whether they get bonus compensation on a particular home, Thiel said.

Why NOT Michael Thiel, is it because Realtors don't Really have to Disclose anything that may be of the Real Estate Consumers best interest.

But given the vast amount of information available to buyers via the Internet, it's easy for savvy consumers these days to know what properties are out there -- and decide whether they're being shown all of the homes that fit their needs, said Phyllis Pezenik, vice president of sales and leasing for DJK Residential, a real-estate firm in New York.

Yes, Buyers are getting Internet Savvy, too bad that Realtors who are listing properties are NOT internet savvy. Yes the Internet is exposing the greed and corruption of the Realtors.

"If a buyer becomes aware of another property that is similar or better ... and the agent has not told them about it, that would tend to make them wary of that broker," she said. "If you feel through your own research that you're not being shown all the properties that meet your criteria, that definitely is a buyer's decision to move on."

Bull, the agent will just make an appointment to show them and act like they missed it and the Real Estate Consumer will NOT BE "wary" - they will believe the Realtor.

Before going separate ways, Thiel said it might be wise for buyers to first talk about the concerns with their real-estate agent. But when a client doesn't believe that their agent has his or her best interest at heart, then perhaps it is indeed time for a change in representation.

Realtor cannot ever protect the Real Estate Consumer it is a Fact.

"There are a lot of agents out there who will try and work with them," he said.
As for sellers considering the incentive tactic, try and get a gauge for what other sellers in the area are offering in terms of bonuses and commission share, Tyler said. A seller might ask brokers about perks other sellers are offering.


However, some might decide it's a better move to appeal to the buyer's pocketbook by agreeing to cover closing costs or cutting the sale price instead,

Do NOT use a Realtor, there will be more money for you, the real estate consumer, and less room for corruption if you keep the Realtor out of the deal, all together.

Crystal L. Cox montana
Real Estate Industry Whistleblower



Article Link
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/home-sellers-try-sweetening-pot/story.aspx?guid=%7B50ACD89C%2DE126%2D40FE%2D92A5%2D11479EDFA8C8%7D

Powerful Mega Tips for Selling Without a Realtor.

to be Posted

Fixes, for the Mess the Real Estate Industry is In.

What Do I want to Happen

I want E and O insurance to protect all parties to the real estate transaction. E and O insurance should not protect the Realtor that is wrong, has failed to disclose and has committed obvious fraud. I want local Association of Realtors to act in Basic Right or Wrong values and to really make their members accountable for Ethics Violations and Standards of Practice Violations. I want E and O insurance to NOT be mandatory in any way if it has no elements in place to protect the real estate consumer. Or possibly if big business, such as insurance companies need to keep this revenue stream then I want them to also provide an insurance that a buyer can buy to protect them from fraud and non-disclosure.

I want Local Association of Realtors to NOT discourage their Good Members from turning in the bad agents for fraud, breaking the law, and for breaking ethics and standards of practice violations. I bought into the concept that “Realtor” was of a Higher Standard, when I was an agent, I convinced my Broker to join “Realtor” and Sold him on all the good reasons why to be a Realtor, my extreme niavity ended quite abruptly when I found that those ethics and a higher standard of practice that the National Association of Realtors pretends to be is just an illustion to suck in the Real Estate Consumer and unsuspecting Realtors. When really there is no real attempt to make the Big Shot Realtors at the Local MLS follow and adhere to the Ethics and Standards of Practice that are supposed to be there and why I proudly joined the National Association of Realtors.

I want, as a Broker Owner, A Realtor to be able to, yes make a good living, but protect their client to the best of their ability and to not turn a blind eye when their real estate consumer is losing everything because of their actions. The Realtor simply ducks and covers and it all blows over.

I want the MLS data to be policed for quality control and the brokers file, the settlement statement and the closing papers to make sure that they have the same SOLD data as the Realtor MLS, this MLS Data Makes the Market and is, in part, a major contributing factor to falsly inflating prices and a market that is doomed to fall hard, as it already has.

I want the Title Company to have to keep a copy of EVERYTHING to do with a real estate transaction, including easements, buy sell, listing, disclosures, any and all inspections, failed sales and why. This will protect the real estate consumer more then currently. How it is now there is no way to prove their was a sail fail that had anything to do with an undisclosed previous inspection. The Realtor pretends to not have a copy, the title company claims to “know nothing about it” though some fax cover sheets talk about letting them know when the inspection is done. And it all comes down to the previous buyer that chose not to buy owning the inspection and well, it never turns up. The title company being made to keep a copy of more data is best for all. And folks, the title company never seeing the listing contract and going by whatever the Realtor tells them is fact, is a serious problem.
The Title company never looks at the listing agreement, a binding contract, to see what the commission on a real estate transaction is. They Simple ask the listing agent and they pay what to whom, based on whatever that Realtor says.

I want Real Estate School to teach real estate and not to teach us how to pass a test. I wanted to know more about contract law, and ways to protect my clients. I wanted a real education and what I got as an agent was one week to learn how to pass a test and another week. I have read the Law of Real Estate Brokers by D. Barlow Burke, Jr. I was not required to nor trained in anything in that huge law book. Realtor designations and trainings really need to teach something that we can use to protect and serve the real estate consumer.

And well there is more, but I will Save that for a Later Post.
real estate industry

Are you Still Paying 8% for your Realtor to list your Land? Realtors are Scaming you, Realtors Lie.

This is a VERY big scam. There is less liability and less work to do when listing land, and yet the Realtors convince the Seller that land is worth more commission to the Realtor. I fought this my first year in real estate, I offered 5% but my fellow Realtors convinced my Sellers and potential Sellers that I was not offering the same service or as good for those rates, when in fact I was offering more then “the same service”. And one of the Realtors went door to door telling folks how me offer "cheaper rates" was because I was not as good or offering less of a service. Yes Unethical and in the Realtor Ethics and Standards of Practice, but these games and attempts at boycotting Realtors who give you a break, as a real estate consumer, these things happened ALL the time and they still do.

Don’t let Realtors convince you that land is worth a higher commission, this is a scam.

Should there Be a National License ?

I think that there should be a National Licensing and Federal law accountability that would help the real estate consumer in individual states to have more rights and protection. But then again maybe a National Real Estate License, would make it easier for Realtors to lie, fail to disclose and fraud the Real Estate Consumer.

It would make ALL fraud pretty much legal if this National License required Mandatory E and O insurance. Remember, E and O insurance protects the Realtor and keeps you, the Real Estate Consumer in Court for Years, no matter how much Proof of Fraud that you have.

If there were a National License, there had better be a national task force for quality control over data and to watch the "agenda" of the National Association of Realtors.

how often does your realtor call you - Today's Search Real Estate Question

This was today’s questions searched on my blogs.

Here’s the thing, either you have a good working relationship with your Realtor or you do not. I recommend that you sell as a FSBO using the power of the internet, but if you must use a Realtor, remember your selling Is not their priority, the priority is to sell something, and quite often your property comes in handy as bait.

I tried to stay in contact with my Sellers at least once a week, email is a good way, that way your Realtor can stay in touch when they have a moment. They should let you know about leads and keep you involved, but keep in mind this may not even be true. I have seen Realtors show their listings to their Secretaries just before it expires to be sure and keep the listing.

Use your Intuition, put what you expect from your Realtor in your Listing Contract. Remember that those “Standard “Realtor” Forms” are to protect the Realtor and are not designed to protect you, the real estate consumer.

So you can write in and initial ANY changes that you want to make, you are a “party to the contract”. You can also exclude ANY Realtor or buyer on that contract and put in a Clause that if for ANY reason you are not satisfied with your Realtor, the Way your Real Estate for Sale Is being marketed or for any reason that you may cancel this contract at any time. Don’t let the Realtor say that you will owe a marketing fee if you Cancel your Listing.

The Realtor uses your listing as bait to sell something and even if you don’t’ sell, cancel or just move on they still have a pool of potential buyers that they got from your Real Estate Listing. Don’t let them make you pay to market their business.

What if there are 2 Easements into the Property ?

So the Realtor drives you in on one Road, and after the Closing you find out that the "Easement Paper" work that you were given was actually on a different road, and was not even filed at the court house. At this point you will have to right like heck to get what you thought you had. If it has already happened, get as much proof as you can, the buy-sell agreement, all paperwork and disclosures, any advertising about the property, mls sheets and emails and go talk with a real estate attorney.

Tips on Interviewing a Real Estate Attorney

Remember they work for you, if they treat you like the criminal instead of the victim, move on. You deserve to be respected, make the right choice the first time. Talk with other clients if you can, have a couple conversations to see how the dialog will be. Remember this attorney could be a part of your life for months to years. It does not hurt, in my opinion to take a few weeks, just take some time, because if you find out after you choose, pay a retainer or agree to a share of the settlement or judgement it is too late to go back. And if you go on an hourly rate then fire them for treating you bad, lying to you or not doing what you thought they would for you, then you will look unstable, you will be made to look fickle when really it is the real estate attorney that was the problem. So push the communication boundaries, before you sign the contract, odds are if they are short with you, make you feel bad, talk down to you, lie to you or treat you like the criminal then this can come up before you sign if you engage in enough conversation to get a feel for what they are after, their integrity and respect level and how they feel about your case.


About the Same Easement Issue Before You Buy:

Have the Realtor and or Seller show you the easement, have them show you an easement agreement in writing that has been recorded, hire a surveyor to tell you where this easement really is, have it flagged (this could even be a contingency that you ask of the seller).

Make the Title Company give you a copy of the "Legal Easement" that is recorded and have them sign that they gave it to you and in reference to what property.

The Easement to your property may not show up on your title insurance, in my state it does not. Here it is on the property that the easement crosses, so make sure the title company digs it up, if this matches what the Realtor gave you then get your surveyor. This is Time and Money Well Spent and is very important.

Find out what you can and prove this legal access, way before your closing, check the legal description, talk to the owner whose land it crosses and turn over every rock you can Before your Closing. You want to make sure that the road you drove on is really the road you will have legal access on. You want to make sure that the land owner is not adverse to you being there, better to know now, before it is a future - stressful drama.

Believe me if this is not all proven absolutely and Not just the Realtors word, the Seller or Title agents word and not just because the "buy sell" says so, this could cause you a huge amount of stress for years, put you in a huge - never ending neighbor fued and cause your real estate value to plummet. If you get a loan, your lender may not know, the appraiser may not know. I have seen these situations folks, find out more.

Knowledge is Power.

Question: Do Realtors have a Governing Body ?

This was one of many questions today in our search stats.

Folks, NO, there is no real governing body over Realtors. Realtors are Self Governed and therefore do what they like. The Realtors themselves actually decide if a Realtor should get "punished or be accountable" for anything they say or conveniently forget to say.

They have grievance committees that supposedly look into matters where it is suggested that Realtors have violated ethics or standards of practice, but managing brokers are allowed to be on these committees making it impossible for one broker to talk with another about a problem with an agent. The local Realtors association with their supposed "grievance committee" and there in house "due process" makes it so that some Realtors are above the Law, above the Code of Ethics and the Standard of Practice.

The Better Business Bureau encourages you to "work" your problems out, and therefore if your "actual" issue with a Realtor goes beyond the local MLS office it will be shut down here unless, you the Real Estate Consumer persists in filing a complaint. The BBB will discourage it, even in the face of blatant out right fraud.

Also Realtors have E and O insurance and if you do have a real issue, even if you have proof, the Realtor's insurance will keep you in court so long that You Lose.

Now, also on this note it is illegal according to NAR, a National Association of Realtors trademark violation to say or write the word Realtor in place of Real Estate Agent. Though this is VERY misleading to the real estate consumer, whom most all, actually say "Realtor" instead of Real Estate Agent. So if the question is do Real Estate Agents have a Governing Body ?

Then yes, they do. Real Estate Agents have to have contining education, they have to take tests and have a certain amount of sales to qualify for Broker. And the Board of Realty Regulations or Real Estate Commission in some states helps to make laws that supposedly gover real estate agents, however, I don't see them enforcing these laws.

State Boards answer to the National Association of Realtors, at the State, Local and National level. They do not have the money or attorney power that the Realtors have so the "Realtors" get what the Realtors want. And what the Realtors want is Not what is in the best interest of the real estate consumer. But instead what is in the best interest of the Realtor.

If you complain to the state real estate board or commission on a Real Estate Agent, they can repremand, put it "on record" or in the "round file". But they cannot really help you get your money back, or make the agent pay for the harm they have done, this is a battle for the courts and the Real Estate Attorney, who is Clueless about what the Real Estate Agents really do behind the closed doors of your real estate transaction.

So if there is a Magical "Governing Body" over Realtors, I, as a Real Estate Broker Owner, have yet to see it do any good for the Real Estate Consumer.

What a Crock - what Realtors Must Do? Are you Kidding Me, or Else What?

Realtor Ethics and Standards
a Big Fat Lie to Comply with Anti-Trust
and other Governing Bodies that don't
Really Know how Bad that the
Real World of Real Estate Really Is.

Realtors Do Not Protect the Intereste of their Clients.
the National Association of Realtor lobby's against
the Real Estate Consumer.

Realtors Duty and Realtors are Not Self Serving
what a Crock.

She claims that Realtor Duties are higher then law,
bull Realtors that do not abide by the law
are protected by local Realtor Boards and Associations.
"Realtor" NAR in no way strives to go
Above and Beyond to protect the consumer
or to make sure that laws are not broken.

The Words Consumer Protection on this Video
over the R screen is a VERY big Lie.
"Realtor" NAR does not Protect you,
Not at All. I can Prove It.

Protect only Clients and Customer,
Again, No Way!!

This Video is a Joke,
the real estate consumer is led to believe
that NAR members are of a higher standard
and that they are made to comply with eithics...
in the Real World of Real Estate this is Simply NOT True.

The REALTOR® Promise - Ready Now - Put your Hand over your Heart, Face the Post Below and Let's Begin.

The REALTOR Promise: As REALTORS® we Pledge…

To strive to be honorable and to abide by the Golden Rule;

To strive to serve well my community, and through it, my country;

To abide by the REALTORS'® Code of Ethics and to strive to conform my conduct to its aspirational ideals;

To act honestly in all real estate dealings;

To protect the individual right of real estate ownership and to widen the opportunity to enjoy it;

To seek better to represent my clients by building my knowledge and competence.

Realtors Lie to Consumers and Fail to Disclose and No One Holds them Accountable for their actions. No one can make a Realtor liable for their Lies.

Real Estate Consumers are hurt everyday at the Lies that Realtors tell them. Yes it is a cruel world and people lie sometimes, the thing is with members of the National Association of Realtors they Lie, They fail to Disclose and they are not held accountable by the So called “Higher Standard” umbrella of NAR that they work under.

No one hears the cries of the real estate consumer, sleepless night after sleepless night as they wonder if tomorrow will be a better day. If tomorrow they will find a way to get the Realtor to pay for the lies they told, or for what they did not disclose that has made it so that the real estate they purchased is now un-sellable, dangerous to live in, worth less, or causing major damage to the structure and basically ruining the real estate consumers life.

Even if you have proof the Realtors lied, you have to fight for the Rights that Should be Basic in a Real Estate transaction. Having a Realtor in the Real Estate transaction actually provides more legal protection for the Realtor and makes it easier for the buyer to be cheated, lied to, mislead, and Not disclosed to.

Without the Realtor, the buyer could sue the seller, and with proof maybe win - maybe not but it would be a more cut and dried situation.

If a Real Estate Agent is not a “Realtor”, a member of the National Association of Realtors or a Non-Franchise Real Estate Broker, then this too is better for the real estate consumer, because they will dig harder to make sure that what they are telling is actually true.

Why? They have more liability, non-Realtors do not have that Super Power of the National Association of Realtors, those who lobby for them, and the Giant Insurance Companies behind them.

The Top E and O insurances want, demand that you be a Realtor Member or they will not insure you. Why is this ? Well because “Realtor” members are of a Higher Standard. Not True, but hey it’s their motto so …

In the Selling of a Home or Property the Realtor and the Previous Seller can act like “they did not know”. Even if they did it is hearsay right? But once you the buyer know the problem and try and get the Realtor to pay for their lies then you become the Seller and you now have to disclose, you cannot say I did not know and get away with it as the previous Seller and the Realtor did.

I have had Realtors, ask me if my client fixed a problem under the floor in the kitchen on a property that I had listed for sale. You see Their Client or Friend wants to know BEFORE they buy, what a novel concept right?

Well it just so happens that only 6 months prior to this “Foot in Mouth” phone call by a local Century 21 Broker Owner, my Client had bought this property with One of My “Realtors” as their buyers agent, and they did not disclose this “problem” to my client. Yes they found it, they fixed it, it was an issue of, well I can’t sue the Realtor, I will lose and it will cost more to try and get justice and accountability, so the owner fixed it. To find out later that the Realtor knew and admitted they knew was shocking.

He did so Boldly because, as a Century 21 Agent, he knew that there really was not way to touch him. Many times, this same agent had been “protected” by the Local Association of Realtors. He was and is a Broker Owner, A Realtor, and the local association gives him protection and special treatment. This is not unique to the area I am talking about. I have seen this in several states and several Realtor Associations.

C21, Coldwell Banker, Sotheby’s and ERA have even more protection because they are all owned by the same Corporation, and in this they have attorneys, insurance and mega-protection which means to you the real estate consumer, You Lose.

Oh I know you were lied to and misled, I know that your Realtor failed to disclose, but you see we will keep you in court longer then your pocketbook, your life, your kids life, and your marriage can possibly stand.

The National Association of Realtors lobbies to make sure they have more rights then you. No one lobbies effectively for Consumers Rights in Real Estate because who has more money then the National Association of Realtors? And is willing to spend it fighting for the rights of the Real Estate Consumer in the Real World of Real Estate.

So, with this, the laws lean more and more every month - day - week to make it easier for the Realtor to lie, Mandatory E and O insurance is one of these horrible acts on the Real Estate Consumer. Making, the Real Estate Agent, by Law Protect themselves from the Real Estate Consumer. I did NOT want protection from YOU. I wanted to Protect you.

Several times I have seen a Realtor put in writing that a buyer will have Lake Access, that the Seller currently has lake access and the buyer will have it once they buy.

This particular CRIME, fraud, and failure to disclose, I have seen over and over and the agent who said their was lake access in writing, on the buy sell and in advertising to sell the property, well they did not even get called on it, they were protected so much that it never became an issue. The Real Estate Consumer is Simply like a bothersome fly, and can do no real damage to the Realtor. The local association will NOT listen, the State Realtors Association is No Help What So Ever.

The Realtor deliberately lies or just goes with what the seller says without proving it and in the end the buyer is left to fight for years to get justice or to get the lake access that they were told would “come with” the Sale. No one defends the consumers right to actually get what they thought they were buying, after all parties get a pay check, what the buyers are left with

Whether Realtors lie deliberately or without really knowing the facts, either way they have No Liability. They can simply say they did not know and the laws protect them.

They should have known, especially before they used “Lake Access” in their Marketing. But the Realtor knows they have No Real Liability and a whole lot of loopholes to get out of any financial Accountability so they don’t go ahead and Prove what the seller says, and provide no real proof to the lake access except for, oftentimes, simply writing it on the buy sell and this means nothing.

One Incident, I listed a 20 acre parcel, the Seller said that they had lake access, I believed them, however, I wanted proof in my file so I asked the Seller for the easement or documents that proved they had lake access. The documentation that they had was a buy sell agreement, whereby the Seller and the Realtor wrote into the agreement that their was lake access.

The buyer thought that if it was on the buy sell then it was true, and that they really had Lake Access. It does not matter what the Buy Sell says, yes it is a legal binding contract, but after you sign the closing papers, ( and the title company will Not prove anything on the buy sell), anyway after you sign then it is what it is. You have to make all parties prove what they promised or offered you in the Buy Sell before you sign the closing papers. The buyer thinks that the real estate buy sell agreement is a binding contract.

It is in the sense that if the buyer and seller signs and one tries to back out you can take a few years out of your life and Sue for “Specific Performance” to hold the buyer or the seller to the contract, should they want out for any reason.

However, the buy sell is not legally binding automatically, in any way, you have to fight for your right to actually have what the buy sell agreement promised that you should or could have. In this Situation the Seller, who use to be the buyer, also had the original ads that the Realtor put out claiming that their was lake access. Turned Out they had no lake access and would never get it because the lake was fed by an irrigation ditch and had a turbine in it, they did not want anyone on it.

The Realtor, the Seller can promise the moon, they can be lying or really believe what they are saying, either way You Need to Prove it Before You Sign.

Peoples Lives are Ruined by Realtors that Are Not held Accountable for the lies that they knowingly or unknowingly tell.

The Insurance that Realtors have will Beat the Real Estate Consumer pretty much every time, even in the biggest most proven cases of fraud.

Realtors are Bound by Law they have to “Investigate” complaints, they have to listen to the real estate consumer and do the right thing. That is what many say and what many believe

I Say This is Bull on every level. The Director at the Association of Realtors encourages (makes, misleads, denies) the “Realtor” members to not file a complaint, she Flat Out Denies them Due Process. She also does this when the Real Estate Consumer calls her for help. She suggests a real estate attorney and so begins the Diary of A Lawsuit.

Years of your life, no help what so ever from the Realtor or the Realtor Association that got you into the mess in the first place. They go on to other “Victims” I mean real estate consumers, they continue sleeping well at night and making money.

While the Consumer begins the lawsuit to fight for what the Realtor told them they had, or for the non-disclosure of a Realtor, The Local Association of Realtors turns a Blind eye to the distress of the consumer, this includes a Realtor Member who becomes a Real Estate Consumer. Turning on their own, picking the Realtor with the Biggest Franchise Behind them.

This is the Cold Hard Facts of the Real World of the Real Estate Industry.

What do I hope to gain from all this blathering? Well not Justice that’s for sure. I hope to Stop you from go through what others have gone through. I hope to Stop you from what, I myself have seen and gone through personally.

I could just walk away, quit being a real estate broker, get a new career and move on quietly. But that is not my, I am Very good at real estate, however, I cannot stomach the total disregard for the Rights of the Real Estate Consumer before, during and after the real estate transaction. I cannot stomach the commercials, billboards and websites that claim that Realtors are of a Higher Standard and that they are the Voice of Real Estate.

The National Association of Realtors need to be stripped of their trademark on “NAR is the Voice for Real Estate”. This is propaganda, this is a slogan, a way to pull in the unsuspecting prey, this could be new “Realtors” or the “Real Estate Consumer”. Come on over to NAR, we got your back, we are “…the Voice for Real Estate”, we constantly lobby against the consumer and there is nothing they can do about it. Join the National Association of Realtors and you to can be of a “Higher Standard”.

So how do you Prove that you have Lake Access Before you buy?

Here are Buyers Tips that I would Do if it we me, after all the Lies, Non-Disclosure and Deception that I have seen.
Talk to the Neighbor Whose Land Your Easement is Supposedly On. This way you can make sure that they are in agreement and no “issue” will come up “after you close”.

Make the Title Company show you a Legally Recorded Easement across the land that Your Easement is Supposedly On.

Make the Seller prove that the easement is real before you sign, such as with a “Contingent on acceptable and recorded proof of legal easement.. Lake Access, etc.”

You really can’t say to much. After the closing it is too late to put anything in writing or to prove anything. Everybody has your money and they move on.
Bodies of that Particular body of water.. Whatever it may be in that particular area.

Never believe the Realtor or the Seller, they may lie or they may really believe that there is lake access, either way you pay the price. You’re the one left with sleepless nights and to fight for what you were told you were buying.

Is the land Marsh Land, can you drive on it, prove it…
Proof is NEVER just because it is on the Buy Sell Agreement or just Because the Seller or the Realtor Said.

Make every effort to protect yourself and leave your assets, your family’s protection up to No One. There is a Major Price difference and demand level for Lake Access versus Non-Lake access. And If this has happened to you email your story to Crystal@CrystalCox.com and we will get your story told on our large network of news and real estate websites and blogs.

A Realtor can Legally Lie

And by legally I mean they brush it off as a Clerical error, that admit to it, the advertising proves they marketed the property with lake access,

They do not have to prove there is lake access, in any way, before they market a property as having lake access, they just say it and wait for a buyer. When the buyer finally figures out the do Not have lake access, the Seller is long gone and the Realtor shrugs off all liability by saying it was a mistake or clerical. And their E and O insurance keeps the innocent buyer in court for years.

So the Realtor can Legally Lie, meaning not be held liable, tell you anything about a property, and Once you find out it is not true, say when you go to build a dock, plan a family function at the lake or go to sell and want to get your paperwork in order, well by then your kind of screwed. You now have to fight for what the advertising, the seller, the Realtors and the Buy sell agreement claimed that you had in the first place.

Title companies have no liability or responsibility, if, say a buy sell says there is lake access they do not have to and won’t bother to prove that, unless You make them. Remember it most likely will not be something on your title report, it would be a document that would “Encumber” someone else’s land and therefore it would be on their title insurance policy or a document you can get by tracking it down Before you Sign your closing papers.

I would include a Contingency on the Buy Sell that says something like, this offer is contingent on the Seller providing acceptable and legally recorded proof of the lake access easement.

Also if I were you, knowing what I know now, I would find a way to talk to the land owner that the supposed easement is across. You can go right up to the door, call them, if they are out of town - find them or make your Realtor find them, speak to them Before you sign, to see if there is any Bad Feelings, issues, or if they are, indeed, in agreement that if you buy you will really have lake access.
Take Care out there and watch Your Back

Appraisals are Opinion

People, Appraisers, Keep telling me that One Comp Does NOT make a Market. Again I see examples of old comps used, and only one to create a "Value". In the Real World of Real Estate Appraisal are Not Real or Accurate in any way. Appraisals are Opinion.

It is Impossible to Be an Honest Realtor

Where is the Glitch ? Who is the Problem ? Why are Consumers Not Protected from Realtors ? Why are Realtors NOT encouraged to Obey the Law ? Why are No Realtors Held to Ethics or to Standard of Practice.
r


There will Be Many More Messages to the National Association of Realtors asking them Why They DO NOT enforce Ethics or accountability or even encourage it.
Realtor
Why NAR does Not even Care to make sure that their members are obeying the laws, following the Code of Ethics and Doing Right By the Consumer.
Realtor
Why Does the NAR encourage E and O insurance to Be Mandatory when it Protects the Realtor and in No Way Protects the Real Estate Consumer.
Why Do Realtors Not have to Actually Prove things like "Lake Access" when they advertise a property has access and the buyer is left to fight for what was promised to them in the Buy Sell?
and Oh... So much More...
Why?
r

COURT OPENS DOOR TO SUIT ON DECEPTIVE HOME SALES - a 2001 Real Estate News Tidbit

By JOE MAHONEY DAILY NEWS ALBANY BUREAU CHIEF
Tuesday, November 20th 2001, 2:24AM

ALBANY - In a victory for consumers, the state's highest court ruled yesterday that New York City's consumer protection law applies to residential real estate transactions.

Reversing a lower court ruling, the Court of Appeals said real estate services marketed by a company called Better Homes Depot could be scrutinized by the city's Consumer Affairs Department.

The company, which buys and repairs houses and then offers them for sale, was sued by the city agency after it got complaints from 15 consumers who said they were subjected to deceptive sales practices. The consumer agency said Better Homes Depot threatened to keep down payments after potential buyers found problems with the properties.

Better Homes Depot and its owner, Eric Fessler, said the city code was not designed to cover their real estate marketing activities. But if that were the case, said Court of Appeals Judge Albert Rosenblatt, "we would effectively insulate fraudulent conduct from the reach of the code whenever the conduct occurs in connection with the sale or attempted sale of a house."

A spokeswoman for state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer said the ruling will help consumers and that deceptive real estate practices "are becoming more of a problem throughout the New York City metropolitan area."

A lawyer for Better Homes Depot, Jeffrey Mitchell, said he had no immediate comment on the decision.

The ruling means the city agency's lawsuit against Better Homes Depot can proceed.
r
Knowledge is Power
r

Dual Agency

Many are Out there Fighting to Stop Dual Agency. I think this is a Good Thing. Meaning I think that Dual Agency should be stopped, however it is not that Simple. I believe that if two agents in one office are working on a deal, one with the buyer and one with the sale and they have the same broker or managing Broker, that is Still Dual Agency.

In the Current "Real World of Real Estate" Dual Agency will get you, the Real Estate Consumer and Better Price and you will be Treated Better with the least amount of Reprucussions.

Those Trying to Stop Dual Agency are Right On, however, for now the Consumer is Navigating in the Real World of Real Estate an in that Dual Agency is Friend not Foe.

Those hurt by Dual Agency, in my opinion are hurt by Realtors in general, by lack of accountability. I do not believe that Preventing Dual Agency will be any kind of a miracle for the morals, ethics and day to day practices of the Real Estate Industry. If Dual Agency is Gone then Realtors can even be more Blatant about Taking your Listing and Doing Nothing to Sell it.

Say I convince you to List your Real Estate for Sale with Me, then If Dual Agency is Illegal, then I, If I was your Realtor, could have a Legal Excuse to do nothing, no marketing would make sense right, except marketing to other Realtors. If I actually worked hard for you and marketing in a way that actually got you a buy then No Dual Agency would make that illegal. So if No Dual Agency, I take your listing and I wait for another Realtor to Sell your Property while I do nothing. So you Hire me to Be your "Real Estate Broker" , I take Your Listing and then can Legally Do Nothing to get a buyer, because if Dual Agency is illegal then it is Illegal for Me to find you a Buyer. These are things to think about.

I really do understand those fighting dual agency, they have been burned. But in my opinion it is way bigger then Dual Agency and the Realtor need to be removed from the Real Estate Transactio period Unless More Accountability, Transparency, Quality Control and Consumer Protection can Really Be Encouraged and Enforced at Every Level of the National Association of Realtors.

I am Sure that Realtor, Buyers agents Would Love to See Dual Agency GONE, then they would get more business. Buyers agents fighting against Dual Agency may have trouble listing and Selling. You, the Real Estate Consumer need to look at what is Really Best for you - what will protect you on all levels of your real estate transaction. A Buyers Agent just don't have the access to the Seller, the information on the property or the the ability to Get you a Better Deal. It is the Cold Hard Facts.



Here are Some Fighting Dual Agency

Template by - Abdul Munir | Daya Earth Blogger Template